Understanding Enzymic Reactivity – New Directions and Approaches

Main Article Content

Sosale Chandrasekhar


New approaches towards understanding the reactivity of enzymes–central to chemical biology and a key to comprehending life itself–are discussed herein. The approach overall is based on the idea that structural and reactivity features uniquely characteristic of enzymes–in being absent in normal catalysts–are likely to hold the key to the catalytic powers of enzymes. The quintessentially physical-organic problem is addressed from several angles, both kinetic and phenomenological. (Generally, the Pauling theory of transition state stabilization is adopted as the rigorous basis for understanding enzyme action).

The kinetic approach focuses on the inadequacies of the Michaelis-Menten equation, and proposes an alternative model based on additional substrate binding at high concentrations, which satisfactorily explains experimental observations. The phenomenological approaches focus on the inadequacies of the intramolecularity criterion, thus leading to alternative strategies adopted by nature in the design of these mild yet powerful catalysts, characterized by exquisite selectivity.

Preferential transition state binding at the active site, via both hydrophobic and van der Waals forces, appears to be the major thermodynamic driver of enzymic reactivity. In operational terms, however, multifunctional catalysis–practically unique to the highly ordered enzyme interior–is likely the key to enzymic reactivity. A new concept, ‘strain delocalization’, possibly plays an important role in orchestrating these various effects, and indeed justifies the need for a large proteinic molecule for achieving the enormous rate enhancements generally observed with enzymes.

Thus, this renewed approach to understanding enzymic reactivity departs significantly from currently held views: radically, in abandoning the Michaelis-Menten and intramolecularity models; but also commandeering existing ideas and concepts, although with a shift in emphasis towards transition state effects (including the entirely novel idea of ‘strain delocalization’).The coverage is not exhaustive, but aims to introduce new ideas along with fresh insights into previous works.

Active site, catalysis, hydrophobic, intramolecularity, Michaelis-Menten, multifunctional catalysis, strain delocalization, van der Waals.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chandrasekhar, S. (2020). Understanding Enzymic Reactivity – New Directions and Approaches. Asian Journal of Research in Biochemistry, 7(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrb/2020/v7i230133
Opinion Article


Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger principles of biochemistry. 7th ed. New York: Freeman; 2017.

Fersht A. Structure and mechanism in protein science. 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Kaissa Publications; 2017.

Kirby AJ, Hollfelder F. From enzyme models to model enzymes. Cambridge (UK): Royal Society of Chemistry; 2009.

Agarwal PK. A biophysical perspective on enzyme catalysis. Biochemistry 2019; 58(6):438–449.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01004

Davidi D, Longo LM, Jablonska J, Milo R, Tawfik DS. A bird’s-eye view of enzyme evolution: chemical, physicochemical, and physiological considerations. Chem Rev. 2018;118(18):8786-8797.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00039

Pauling L. The nature of forces between large molecules of biological interest. Nature 1948;161:707-709.

DOI: 10.1038/161707a0

Steinfeld JL, Francisco JS, Hase WL. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1999.

Zhang X, Houk KN. Why enzymes are proficient catalysts: Beyond the Pauling paradigm. Acc Chem Res. 2005:38(5):379-385.

DOI: 10.1021/ar040257s

Kessel A, Ben-Tal N. Introduction to proteins. Structure, function and motion. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.

Silverman RB. The organic chemistry of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002.

Chandrasekhar S. Intramolecularity and enzyme modelling: A critique. Res Chem Intermediat. 2003;29(1):107-123.

DOI: 10.1163/156856703321328451

Chandrasekhar S. On the presumed kinetic consequences of pre-equilibrium. Implications for the Michaelis-Menten equation. Zh Fiz Khim A. 2012;86(4):709-713.

DOI: 10.1134/S0036024412040061

Smith MB. March’s advanced organic chemistry: Reactions, mechanisms and structure. 8th ed. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley; 2020.

Gherib R, Dokainish HM, Gauld JW. Multi-scale computational enzymology: Enhancing our understanding of enzymatic catalysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(1):401-422.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms15010401

Robles VM, Ortega-Carrasco E, Alonso-Cotchico L, Rodriguez-Guerra J, Lledós A, Maréchal JD. Toward the computational design of artificial metalloenzymes: From protein−ligand docking to multiscale approaches. ACS Catal. 2015;5(4):2469− 2480.

DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00010

Chandrasekhar S. Critical reflections on the hydrophobic effect, its origins, and manifestation: water structure, chemical reactivity, micelles, and gels. J Turk Chem Soc, Sect A: Chem. 2017;4(3):899-914.

DOI: 10.18596/jotcsa.328983

Ariga K, Kunitake T. Supramolecular chemistry – fundamentals and applications. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006.

Chandrasekhar S, Srinivasa Gopalan S. Neighbouring group participation by amide N-H and its possible biological significance. J Chem Research (S) 2000;504-505; J Chem Research (M). 2000;1237-1256.

DOI: 10.3184/030823400103166111

Bordwell FG. Equilibrium acidities in dimethyl sulfoxide solution. Acc Chem Res. 1988;21(12):456-463.

DOI: 10.1021/ar00156a004

Chandrasekhar S. The concept of strain delocalization: macrocyclic and biological systems, enzyme catalysis. viXra e-print archive. 2020. Accessed 2020.

Available: viXra:2006.0154

Allinger NL. Molecular structure: understanding steric and electronic effects from molecular mechanics. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley; 2010.